ASTM E1444: Key Changes and Updates

In October 2021, ASTM E1444 was published, replacing the 2016 revision. This revision is a part of a standard review cycle to address changes in the aerospace industry.

 

By Shawn Kilty, Division R&D Manager, and David Geis, Product Manager 

  •  

 

The next revision of ASTM E1444 is out, and a lot is changing.  In total, more than seventy changes and updates are going into effect in this specification. Here are several significant changes you should be aware of. 

 

1. E1444 will become an Aerospace-only standard

There are significant differences in how magnetic particle inspection in Aerospace compared to other industries. Beyond just the process checks, there are restrictions on the allowable types of materials and equipment. Rather than trying to accommodate all possible applications with a single standard, the scope of E1444 is changing to focus only on the Aerospace industry.  Non-Aerospace users will have to switch over to E3024 Standard Practice for Magnetic Particle Testing for General Industry. 

 

2. No visible or dry particles 

One effect of the Aerospace-only scope change is the removal of all references to visible magnetic particle materials — only wet fluorescent magnetic particles in the latest revision. If your application uses visible color-contrast materials or dry magnetic powders, you will need to change to E3024 as your standard. 

 

3. Removal of industrial magnetizing techniques and accessories

With the transition to the Aerospace-only scope, the following accessories and techniques not in E1444: 

  • Laminated Flux Strips
  • Pie Gauges
  • Battery-Powered Yokes
  • Permanent Magnet Yokes
  • Magnetic Leeches
  • Prods
  • Particle Sensitivity Devices (magnetic cards, MTU blocks, etc.)

Handheld yokes, in general, will only be permitted with prior authorization by the Cognizant Engineering Organization (CEO) or Level III. Specialized techniques like magnetic slurries for underwater use, magnetic polymers, tapes, and films are also not included in E1444.   
If your application uses any of these materials or techniques, you will need to change to E3024 as your standard. 

 

4. Changes to process controls and calibrations 

Table 1 in E1444 spells out all of the required process controls and calibrations and the frequency at which each must occur. All of the changes in this revision involve UV-A lamps. New requirements require checking the intensity of battery-powered lights before and after each use. This ensures that a drop in battery output has not caused the UV intensity to fall below the minimum required levels. The integrity of all UV-A lamps must now be completed daily instead of weekly. It is not specified in Table 1 (instead refer to section 7.4.5), but this revision also requires checking that LED UV-A lamps daily to ensure all diodes are functioning. 

 

5. No more Ketos rings 

It has been over 20 years since the publication of AS-5282 standardizing the Tool Steel Ring for system performance. Since then, AS-5282 rings have had better magnetic performance than the original Ketos rings due to stricter alloy and heat treatment control. To accommodate existing systems and older equipment, the specs for old Ketos rings were maintained in E1444. Starting with the new revision, the Ketos ring will not be carried forward, and only AS-5282 rings will be acceptable.

 

5. Removal of formulas for determining proper current

Formulas used to calculate magnetizing current have been around for ages. They are used in MT training programs and for developing a technique on a new part. But real-world part geometry is not always straightforward, and formulas are just a starting point at best. For Aerospace applications, the Level III is responsible for determining the current necessary for adequate magnetization. That is normally done with sample parts and QQIs, not with calculations. While the formulas are no longer in E1444, they will remain in E3024 and E709 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Testing for reference and training purposes.

 

6. Requiring inspection before demagnetization

Inspection of parts before demagnetization is now explicitly required by ASTM E1444.  Inspecting parts after demag increases the likelihood of particles migrating away from an indication, potentially leading to missed flaws. Although this is likely self-evident to most MPI practitioners, it was never explicitly called out in prior revisions of E1444.   

 

7. Discard murky magnetic particle baths

Magnetic particle baths can become cloudy over time for several reasons. Contamination from lubricants or other machining fluids can turn the bath hazy and will sometimes add a bluish fluorescence to the bath.

A cloudy bath could also be a sign of the particles starting to break down. Bright yellow-green fluorescence observed in the liquid bath after the particles have been allowed to settle is the most common sign of particle breakdown.

E1444 now requires that the liquid portion is evaluated for clarity under visible and UV light after the particle concentration test. If the graduation marks on the pear-shaped centrifuge tube (between the 5 and 25 ml marks) are not visible, then the bath must be discarded.   

 

Published October 26, 2021

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Articles

Differences between Level 2 penetrants

How to Select a Level 2 Fluorescent Penetrant

5-question guide to help understand the differences between Level 2 penetrants.

What You Need to Start-up In-house Testing [Checklist]

What You Need to Start-up In-house Testing [Checklist]

Step-by-step process listing everything from the equipment needed in magnetic particle testing and liquid penetrant testing to preparation for NDT audits

Subscribe to Magnaflux News: